AI leadership briefing copilot
A professional-services business where this lands in Leadership.
02 — What is actually going wrong
Partners and directors spend a chunk of every week assembling context: pulling numbers from three systems, reading around a client's sector, catching up on what changed. It is genuinely necessary work done by the most expensive people in the firm, and it is done from scratch every time.
How it works
A standing brief is assembled on a schedule — internal performance against plan, movement on key accounts, relevant external developments — synthesised rather than listed, with the sources attached. Leaders read a brief instead of building one.
What good looks like
The Monday meeting starts from a shared picture instead of from five partial ones. Research hours drop and, more importantly, decisions stop waiting on someone finding time to assemble the context.
03 — The problem, in money
- Leaders5 people51 peoplePlaceholder — not a validated benchmarkStarting point
- Research hours per leader per week4 hours20 hoursPlaceholder — not a validated benchmarkStarting point
- Share automated0.5 ratio0.5 ratioPlaceholder — not a validated benchmarkStarting point
- Leader leader_hourly_value value150 USD530 USDPlaceholder — not a validated benchmarkStarting point
- Share of freed time redeployed0.5 ratio0.5 ratioPlaceholder — not a validated benchmarkStarting point
04 — The options
05 — The call
Build it. A custom system is the right move here — the payback justifies owning it rather than renting a compromise.
06 — How this goes wrong
- Synthesis that flattens dissent. A brief that reads as consensus when the underlying signals disagree is worse than no brief — insist on surfacing contradictions.
- Unsourced claims in an executive brief. Every assertion needs a link, or someone will act on a hallucination at a scale that matters.
- Valuing freed leadership hours at the blended staff rate. This scenario sets hours_rate_key to the leader rate for exactly that reason; a partner hour and an admin hour are not the same asset.
- Briefs nobody reads. If it is not tied to a standing decision forum it becomes another unread email within a month.
07 — How you would actually do it
- 01Identify the decisions the brief is meant to serve. A brief with no decision attached is a newsletter.
- 02Inventory the internal sources and get read-only access sorted before building anything.
- 03Draft the structure by hand for three weeks first — you will change it twice.
- 04Automate assembly, keeping every claim linked to its source.
- 05Attach it to a standing meeting so there is a forcing function to read it.
- 06Ask each reader quarterly which sections they skip, and cut those.
08 — Tools worth looking at
Named for orientation, not endorsement. No affiliate arrangements, and nothing here has been paid for.
09 — Run it on your numbers
Start from industry averages, then drag the inputs to match your business. The number moves live.Drag each input to your number — the starting points are neutral midpoints, not industry data. The number moves live.
10 — The evidence · what others report
Reported numbers are third-party claims, source-attributed — not verified by me, and never blended into the model above.
11 — Questions owners ask
Is this your business?
Get your free AI Opportunity Score — the same first pass I run at the start of every Audit.
Get Your Free Score